This vote, based on legislation I’ve introduced, will and must fail

Representative Dave Camp, Republican of Michigan and chairman of the Ways and Means Committe: via NYT

Wall Street is in on the joke

R. Bruce Josten, executive vice president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce

The practical ramifications of it are dramatic…you’re going to run down the road where the rating agencies are going to have to react, the Fed is going to have to make a set of decisions, international investors are going to have to interpret what this means, and you could functionally have a self-fulfilling prophecy in terms of the risk while not actually having a default…That is such a dangerous path to go down.

Rick Rieder, Managing Director and CIO, BlackRock, suggesting Wall Street might not be in on the joke: via NYT

DealBook’s discussion of the upcoming Wini Jiau case left off with the ratio of pending cases to convictions and guilty-pleas in their on-going insider-trading investigation. It’s 80%.

Some 80% of those ensnared in the insider-trading investigation that shook up the street in the fall of 2010 have either plead guilty or been convicted of crimes related to insider trading. Among those pending, Wini Jiau. According to her court-designated lawyer, former federal prosecutor Joanna Hendon, Wini can’t wait to go “home to California and her beloved dog, Hunter.”

For Judge Jed Rakoff, who will preside over the case, however, the process is just getting started: “I am so impressed with the level of lawyering in this case on both sides. “I saw somewhere in press reports that the parties were talking settlement, and I personally hope that is not true because I am really looking forward to this trial.”

A former financial analyst at NVIDIA pleaded guilty today of criminal conspiracy and insider trading charges. Sonny Nguyen, 39, agreed to provide material nonpublic information he gathered in his role at NVIDIA to peers in an insider trading ring that allegedly spanned, among others, Winifred Jiau, a commonly used expert Primary Global Research LLC network of consultants.

Though “Wini” has not yet plead guilty, she has come under allegations of participating in and promoting insider trading through her engagement with Primary Global. It seems that Nguyen was perhaps one of whom she meant when she was quoted as saying, “As soon as I get it, I give you guys a buzz.”

It would almost seem that the probe is widening, but it’s not. If anything, it appears to be narrowing.

Today’s news began with open speculation by the WSJ that investigators shifted their focus to the principals of Primary Global: Unni Narayanan and Phani Saripella. The shift would appear to match the circumstances. Nguyen claims to have provided Wini inside information. Sam Barai, best known for his colorful instructions to his analyst who had been cooperating with investigators, pleaded guilty today and, according to the WSJ, “the probe of Messrs. Narayanan and Saripella, both former employees of Intel Corp., is being aided by one of their former clients, former hedge-fund founder Sam Barai.”

Investigators have illuminated what looks like a rich vein of corruption, circumscribed by a series of bad actors, both admitted and alleged. If no more convictions come of this, at least it will serve as a lesson describing the importance of compliance policies, procedures, and systems organized by industry-leaders, such as Gerson Lehrman Group, when speaking with outside experts, and at most, it may provide the contours of a gripping movie.

The generation that had information, but no context. Butter, but no bread. Craving, but no longing.

Meg Wolitzer, The Uncoupling, quoted by Bill Keller in the NYT speculating on and lamenting the effect of all this new media on our minds, not the least of which might be said to impinge upon our memories. The devices that support and externalize our memories aren’t crutches. They’re a persistent illustration of our failings compared to a more perfect vessel. Their lesson is one of learned helplessness. Why even try to remember? Why try to improve? When there exists something better and available immediately at hand.

As the Rajaratnam prosecution revealed, the “expert network” firms that produced high-level insights — allegedly by paying technology industry workers for inside information — hardly were engaging in legitimate research.

Jim Pavia, Editor, Investment News.

It’s surprising and disappointing to see Jim Pavia commit a gross failure of analysis in his review of insider trading. The Raj case wasn’t about expert networks. It was about insider trading.

Jim boldly misstates the circumstances, figuring a relationship that he thought must exist, and failing to recognize the fact that Raj was accused of insider trading based on information obtained through personal relationships with insiders, not through expert networks.

The crimes Raj has been convicted of weren’t conducted in the open. They were committed in the shadows, outside of any formal process. His information came from personal relationships and personal sources. If anything the formal compliance systems, controls, and policies of an effectively managed expert network would have scared him off and made him think twice about pressing for inside information. Knowing that an auditable record of his interactions would be on file at the network would have reminded him of his obligations to the law and society.

Yes. Insider trading is a problem. It poisons the market in a way that suggests the “game is rigged.” But one must also learn to recognize it for what it is – bad people doing bad things. Raj was convicted for gathering inside information through  personal relationships with insiders, not through expert networks.

Frans Snyders, 1579-1657

John Allison, the former CEO of banking giant BB&T, has called Atlas “the best defense of capitalism ever written.” Ironically, the bank has taken $3 billion in the recent government bailout. Still, BB&T’s charitable arm donated several million dollars to start classes devoted to Rand’s philosophy on university campuses.

via bnet – 2009


The investment industry is resilient and will continue conducting diligent company research and analysis while the investigations play out. As part of that process, companies and individuals will need to individually judge the potential reputational impact of using expert consultants. But given the need for quality information, the expert network industry — or its next incarnation — undoubtedly will remain a part of many analysts’ toolboxes.

Glenn Doggett, Director of Standards of Practice, CFA Institute: via CFA Institute. Doggett reminds us that there have been bad actors outside of expert networks and bad actors inside of expert networks, but expert networks or their next incarnation will continue to provide an important research service.

[youtube+http://youtu.be/o8lVkg4ecPk]

To turn, as swimmers into cleanness leaping,
Glad from a world grown old and cold and weary

Rupert Brooke, Peace

The rain stopped today. The skies opened. The trees ceased their swaying. And amidst the stillness, investors launched themselves into the market to soak up as many a share as possible of the newly listed LinkedIn. Read the rest of this entry »

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started